If they teach you not to have sex until married, that's cool, but do you really want to give up your virginity to a 16 year old guy you'll never see again most likely? Just be patient. And don't take the risk with birth control. The only guaranteed one is no sex at all.It can still get past, and that could result in another innocent baby being killed. If they must, they should at least have the parents approve the class, and I think the parents should know what they're going to be talking about.

by beththebrave on 3/12/2012 7:03:41 PM

I have a solution! Let sex ed be an elective class, like choir or band. People should get to choose if they want to take that class or not. And with the society we live in these days, you don't need to take sex ed o be informed about sex. I know some people who would actually enjoy taking that class, where as others, like me, would rather jump off a cliff. And I'm going to stop right there and shut my mouth before I start WWIII. Toodles! I'm going to go ask my mom if we can move to Utah

by loveTC247 on 3/12/2012 6:37:41 PM

i'll be completely honest, i am in nooo way against pre marital sex as long as if its with someone you love and not just because you wonder what it's like. and this is the dumbest thing i've ever heard!! just because you don't openly talk about sex doesn't mean that the kids will stay abstinent (as if it's not their choice to have sex or not), just like not talking about homosexuality won't make a gay person any more straight. its just stupid. i hope they enjoy having a ton more heartbroken pregnant girls running aroung their public schools, i guess that is what they'll need to see to make them understand that teens should be informed about options.

by guitargirl7321 on 3/12/2012 6:18:37 PM